Groomers
Under construction Last updated Sep 30, 2023, 2:42pm
Definition
M.A.P.s (Minor Attracted Persons) AKA Child Rapists
Drag Queen Story Hour
Manifesto of Drag Queen Story Hour
Intro
The Details & the Devil Therein
Summary
Exposé
DEFINITION
GROOMING is defined as
the criminal activity of becoming friends with a child in order to try to persuade the child to have a sexual relationship
manipulative behaviors that the abuser uses to gain access to a potential victim, coerce them to agree to the abuse, and reduce the risk of being caught.
Below are sources regarding the phenomenon of grooming children through such things as Drag Queen Story Hour (DQSH), also called Drag Story Hour, the inclusion of sexual books in children’s school library shelves and all-ages sex shops arranged chronologically by publishing date.
M.A.P.S (MINOR ATTRACTED PERSONS) AKA CHILD RAPISTS
Under construction.
DRAG QUEEN STORY HOUR (DQSH)
Manifesto of Drag Queen Story Hour
Intro
What is Drag Queen Story Hour all about? Why do they want to be in kindergarten classrooms or have kids sit on their laps as they read story books?
As we’ll see below,
Drag Queen Story Hour is “a project driven by desire”1 by adults who aim to undemine social and sexual norms in small children,2 to make them queer,3 that is, to make them devoid of natural sexual boundaries,4 to encourage them to “to break the rules”,5 to instill “destigmatization of shame”6 of things that are personal, private, none of their business and “taboo”,7 to expose them to “alternate modes of kinship”,8 to teach them that “family”9 means “other queers on the street”10 which amounts to teaching them to accept strangers with undefined sexual orientations (“queers”) as family members, to put on “family friendly” events for young children by which they admit is “queer code” for “queers on the street” which means strangers with sexuality that lacks boundaries,11 to engage in bodily play and “embodied kinship”12 with these children as a form of praxis13 (activism) to undermine the nation14 and to pervert their natural sexual development for their desires15 which, again, drives their entire project.16 Futhermore, they proclaim that this is just a starting point.17
The Details & the Devil Therein
Drag Queen Story Hour was founded by Harris Kornstein whose drag queen name is Lil Miss Hot Mess.18 He is the author of children’s books such as The Hips on the Drag Queen Go Swish, Swish, Swish19 and he sits on the board of DQSH which is a non-profit oganization.20
Harris Kornstein/Lil Miss Hot Mess is also an assistant professor who heads the Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity (SOGI) program at the University of British Columbia. Harris Kornstein/Lil Miss Hot Mess was involved in a SOGI UBC panel discussion on drag pedagogy along with an other assistant professor, Harper Keenan.21 These two wrote “Drag pedagogy: The playful practice of queer imagination in early childhood” published by Curriculum Inquiry22 in 2020 which is repotedly “the manifesto for the movement”.23 At any rate, it is certainly indicative of their objectives.
Their paper promotes the insertion of “drag pedagogy” and “queer pedagogy into the world of early childhood education”. Pedagogy pertains to teaching methods for children and sometimes adults. In this paper, however, they specify that they are writing about pedagogy “an early childhood context” and what they write, though veiled, is transparent enough to be obvious and disturbing.
They also cite the revered leftist scholar and pervert Michel Foucault and not to criticize him but rather to support their aim. It seems Foucault was a child rapist. See the Michel Foucault section in the Culture War Encyclopedia and/or our video about the matter below.
In their abstract, Keenan and Drag Queen Story Hour founder Lil Miss Hot Mess wrote,
In recent years, a programme for young children called Drag Queen Story Hour (DQSH) has risen to simultaneous popularity and controversy. This article, written collaboratively by an education scholar and a drag queen involved in organizing DQSH, contextualizes the programme within the landscape of gender in education as well as within the world of drag, and argues that Drag Queen Story Hour provides a generative extension of queer pedagogy into the world of early childhood education. Drawing on the work of José Esteban Muñoz, the authors discuss five interrelated elements of DQSH that offer early childhood educators a way into a sense of queer imagination: play as praxis, aesthetic transformation, strategic defiance, destigmatization of shame, and embodied kinship. Ultimately, the authors propose that “drag pedagogy” provides a performative approach to queer pedagogy that is not simply about LGBT lives, but living queerly.
Further on they write,
In this article, we explore the pedagogical contributions of a programme called Drag Queen Story Hour (DQSH) as a form of queer imagining in an early childhood context. Through this programme, drag artists have channelled their penchant for playfully “‘reading’ each other to filth”[footnote 1] into different forms of literacy, promoting storytelling as integral to queer and trans communities, as well as positioning queer and trans cultural forms as valuable components of early childhood education. We are guided by the following question: what might Drag Queen Story Hour offer educators as a way of bringing queer ways of knowing and being into the education of young children?
Why don’t they ask what would be healthy for children instead?
Later in their paper, they write,
Drag Queen Story Hour: A Herstory
DQSH grew from queer author Michelle Tea’s personal desire to connect her toddler with queer culture.
…and…
Soon after, DQSH was replicated by established organizations and in DIY-style events around the world. Most have taken place in libraries, schools, bookstores, and other community spaces. Readings have happened in dozens of locales, from major cities like New York, Mexico City, and Tokyo, to smaller ones like Cleveland, TN and San Marcos, TX (Drag Queen Story Hour, n.d.-b). Many coordinate under an incorporated non-profit organization, though others operate independently.
Keep in mind that this was published in 2020, before it really became popular. They write that in some cases, DQSH events
translate drag’s penchant for taboo to kids’ ideas of silly topics, like making a mess or potty time (Brooklyn Public Library, n.d.).
Should these strange men be discussing such private topics with children? They also write,
We take the public interest in DQSH as a starting point to highlight the generative pedagogical work that drag may offer to children.
Catch that? Reading stories to kids while in drag is just their foot in the door they wrote themselves. They wrote that they encourage children
to break the rules.
They ask,
What if we took play, defiance, and imagination seriously as forms of knowledge production? If we celebrated the convergence of children and drag queens, what kinds of potentialities might their collaboration hold?
Reading on, the reader sees that they authors conception of “queer pedagogy” and “drag pedagogy” involves undermining normally, society and the nation.
The institution of public schooling was founded, in part, as a way of maintaining nation-states
they write and complain that
schooling functions as a way to straighten the child
and,
Queer theory can be used to examine how often-impossible standards of normalcy are formed, not only through institutional categorizations of gender and sexuality, but also through social expectations produced through the racialized structures of capitalism that are inextricably intertwined with that hierarchy
They later introduce the idea of “trans pedagogy” with,
queer and trans pedagogies seek to actively destabilize the normative function of schooling through transformative education
Much further on, they reiterate,
As an art form, drag is all about bending and breaking the rules, and so its aims are totally different from a normative classroom.
and
drag may help elucidate the arbitrariness of rules. By encouraging students to explore the boundaries of acceptability, drag offers a model for participating in a learning experience where axioms are meant to be challenged and authority is not a given. In the school environment, of course, oppressive conditions are often produced by the institution itself, and many children who intuitively resist these conditions are punished.
In their conclusion, they write,
Queer worldmaking, including political organizing, has long been a project driven by desire.
…and…
It may be that DQSH is “family friendly,” in the sense that it is accessible and inviting to families with children, but it is less a sanitizing force than it is a preparatory introduction to alternate modes of kinship. Here, DQSH is “family friendly” in the sense of “family” as an old-school queer code to identify and connect with other queers on the street.
Summary
To summarize, according to the people behind this “project driven by desire”, their aim is to undermine the nation by perverting children, touching them, erasing their natural boundaries about which they naturally feel shame which indicates that they instinctually know are private matters and not matters to involve queer strangers on the street in.
Exposé
As Christopher F. Rufo wrote in “The Real Story Behind Drag Queen Story Hour” for City Journal,24
many parents, even if reluctant to say it publicly, have an instinctual distrust of adult men in women’s clothing dancing and exploring sexual themes with their children.
These concerns are justified. But to mount an effective opposition, one must first understand the sexual politics behind the glitter, sequins, and heels. This requires a working knowledge of an extensive history, from the origin of the first “queen of drag” in the late nineteenth century to the development of academic queer theory, which provides the intellectual foundation for the modern drag-for-kids movement.
Under construction, more coming here.
Lefty Pedo Advocacy : A History (Part One) by Aydin Paladin (October 2, 2017)
Lefty Pedo Advocacy : A History (Part Two) by Aydin Paladin (October 5, 2017)
In Shafted - The Gender Goldmine - How a BC businessman is funding "drag pedagogy" in Canadian Education by Eva Kurilova for Gender Dissent (Dec 15, 2022), we read…
The aim of SOGI UBC, according to the program’s website, is “to transform educational environments to support self-determination surrounding gender and sexuality in schools.”
SOGI UBC currently operates a number of initiatives in an effort to meet this goal, such as the Transformative Education Speaker Series, which focuses on “anti-oppressive teaching and learning.” Past topics include “Queering Land-based Education,” “Trans Hirstory in 99 Objects,” and “Two-Spirit, Queer and Trans Indigenous Youth Change-making.”
Further in the article, we see…
It doesn’t stop there, either. SOGI UBC recently put out a call for proposals from undergraduate and graduate students across Canada for “gender and sexuality” resources for pre-kindergarten to grade 12 students.
Why is the SOGI UBC program so dominated by a focus on the “gender identity” and sexuality of minors?
Meet Harper Keenan, the inaugural Robert Quartermain Assistant Professor of Gender & Sexuality in Education. Keenan grew up and went to school in the United States, earning her doctorate from the Stanford Graduate School of Education in 2019.
In January 2021, she co-authored a paper with drag queen Lil Hot Mess called “Drag pedagogy: The playful practice of queer imagination in early childhood.” Lil Hot Mess, whose real name is Harris Kornstein, is an Assistant Professor in Public & Applied Humanities at the University of Arizona.
Harper Keenan (harperkeenan.com)
Harris Kornstein (pah.arizona.edu/people/harris-kornstein)
Kornstein is a founder of the notorious Drag Queen Story Hour movement, where drag queens read books to kids at libraries, schools, and other events. He also wrote the infamous nursery rhyme picture book The Hips on the Drag Queen Go Swish, Swish, Swish. Seeking to make drag appealing to children, the book is a play on “The Wheels on the Bus.”
(Related reading: Objection to Drag Queen Story Hour in Western Quebec schools)
In 2021, Kornstein participated in a panel talk, facilitated by Keenan, about the topic of “drag pedagogy” for the SOGI UBC Transformative Education Speaker Series.
“Like many queer kids, [drag] was something that I was just drawn to,” Kornstein says in the discussion. “A lot of people have drag families,” he continues, “and I eventually was adopted by a drag mother.”
Keenan (top middle) and Kornstein (top right) during the SOGI UBC drag pedagogy panel discussion
Here is a bit more…
According to the abstract of Keenan and Kornstein’s “Drag pedagogy: The playful practice of queer imagination in early childhood,” two of the key elements of drag pedagogy are the “destigmatization of shame” and “embodied kinship.”
“Destigmatization of shame” seems to be largely about breaking norms and boundaries, especially as they relate to children:
Many campy drag aesthetics like parody and exaggeration destigmatize shame by placing the joke on society, rather than individuals, further revealing to kids that ideas of appropriateness are subject to change… Classroom teachers might similarly work to address children’s feelings of shame by highlighting the arbitrariness of norms.
By “embodied kinship,” Keenan and Kornstein explain, “we suggest that DQSH offers a queer relationality with children that breaks from the reproductive futurity of the normative classroom and nuclear family.”
In his excellent investigation into Drag Queen Story Hour, American journalist Christopher Rufo calls the paper a “manifesto” for the Drag Queen Story Hour movement, highlighting these two elements as well:
As Kornstein and Keenan explain, this is an intellectual and political project that requires drag queens and activists to work toward undermining traditional notions of sexuality, replacing the biological family with the ideological family, and arousing transgressive sexual desires in young children.
Part of what “queer” seems to mean to Kornstein and Keenan is the disruption of stable and protective elements in a child’s life. The other part is the upending of sexual norms and boundaries, painting them as arbitrary and oppressive.
Make no mistake—drag is a form of adult performance that often features vulgar and sexual themes. Its proponents pretend that what is being presented to children is sanitized and “family-friendly,” but this is very often not the case. Videos routinely go viral of drag queens—who, keep in mind, are adult men—dancing in a provocative manner, flashing their crotches at children, and collecting tips as they would at a night club.
In Drag Pedagogy: Grooming by Any Other Name by Eva Kurilova for RADAR (Dec 22, 2022) we find the following regarding Drag Queen Story Hour (DQSH)…
The truth is that DQSH is not harmless, and it is, in fact, steeped in a political and ideological agenda that targets children. Drag itself is adult entertainment full of sexually charged themes meant to be performed at nightclubs. It did not lose these elements when children became the audience.
This is all spelled out in a paper called “Drag Pedagogy: The Playful Practice of Queer Imagination in Early Childhood,” which Christopher Rufo called the “manifesto” of DQSH in his investigation into the movement.
The paper was co-written by Harper Keenan, an assistant professor who heads the SOGI (sexual orientation and gender identity) program at the University of British Columbia and Harris Kornstein, an assistant professor at the University of Arizona, a founder of DQSH, and a drag queen who goes by the stage name Lil Miss Hot Mess.
Keenan and Kornstein were also involved in a SOGI UBC panel discussion on drag pedagogy a few months after the paper was published.
Before we jump into the paper itself, let’s take a quick look at what grooming actually is. RAINN (Rape, Abuse & Incest National Network) defines grooming as: "manipulative behaviors that the abuser uses to gain access to a potential victim, coerce them to agree to the abuse, and reduce the risk of being caught."
Grooming involves tactics like victim selection, victim isolation, desensitization to sexual topics, the pushing of personal boundaries, and attempts to make the behavior seem normal.
These tactics bear more than an uncanny resemblance to the five elements of DQSH as described in Keenan and Kornstein’s paper: “play as praxis, aesthetic transformation, strategic defiance, destigmatization of shame, and embodied kinship.
No, not all drag queens and not all drag queens who read books to children are trying to groom them. In fact, most very likely are not. But the movement itself and particularly the “drag pedagogy” it is based on does employ an awful lot of the tactics of grooming once you take a closer look.
“Drag queens have historically been relegated to the realm of the night,” Keenan and Kornstein begin their paper. “In the past few years, however, drag performers have made their way from the dimly lit bars of gayborhoods and into the fluorescent lights of libraries and classrooms.”
Why? Why did drag queens move from the bars to the classrooms? Well, the paper continues, “DQSH seems to uniquely thread the needle between queer activism and broad cultural acceptance.”
The aim seems to be to create little queer activists, and DQSH is an effective vehicle with which to do it: “Many elements of DQSH are common to early childhood schooling: bright colours, music, art, and imaginative play.”
“The traditional role of the teacher, transformed into a loud and sparkling queen, becomes delightfully excessive,” Keenan and Kornstein write. “Her pedagogy is rooted in pleasure and creativity borne, in part, from letting go of control.”
“Pedagogy rooted in pleasure” and “letting go of control,” are interesting and deliberate choices of phrasing. Keenan and Kornstein also argue that DQST is about exploring “the boundaries of acceptability” and “children’s curiosities about social norms.”
“At many DQSH events,” they write, “children ask genuine questions like ‘are you a boy or a girl?’ or ‘why are you dressed like that?’ … In many cases, drag queens may not respond with answers, but with questions meant to complicate perceptions of gender and society.”
Why can’t the drag queens simply respond that they are men and that dressing up the way they do doesn’t change that? Why do they have to deliberately confuse children about sex and gender?
Well, the aim is not only to create queer activists but to encourage children to be “queer” themselves.
“Drag is an imaginative and creative process. It is grounded in building character,” Keenan and Kornstein explain. “This approach can support students in finding the unique or queer aspects of themselves.”
They continue: “Drag pedagogy might enact a mode of queer kinship that acknowledges that there is already queerness within the classroom.”
By uncovering the queerness that they claim is already there in the classroom, Keenan and Kornstein explain that DQSH seeks to drive a wedge between children and the supportive structures in their lives, like school and family. They say this quite plainly and outright:
“We suggest that DQSH offers a queer relationality with children that breaks from the reproductive futurity of the normative classroom and nuclear family.”
The “normative classroom” and the “nuclear family” are two main areas of child safeguarding. Why should anyone seek to “break” these relationships?
Because, once these relationships are broken, the child is free to be “queer.”
“As drag has moved further into the mainstream, some have questioned whether this queer art form has lost its edge,” Keenan and Kornstein lament. “In discussing the work of DQSH within our social circles, we have occasionally encountered critiques that DQSH is sanitizing the risqué nature of drag in order to make it ‘family friendly.’”
Not to worry, Keenan and Kornstein don’t agree that drag loses its risqué edge when performed in front of children.
“We do not share this pessimistic view,” they write. “Queer worldmaking, including political organizing, has long been a project driven by desire.”
The word “desire,” like “pleasure,” crops up repeatedly throughout the piece. Where this all points is to the final of the five elements of DQSH: embodied kinship.
DQSH and the drag pedagogy that underpins it is not an innocent program where grown men get dressed up as female caricatures and read stories to children—though that’s strange enough.
The ultimate goal, stated clearly at the end of the paper, is to connect kids to a new, “queer” family:
“It may be that DQSH is ‘family friendly,’ in the sense that it is accessible and inviting to families with children, but it is less a sanitizing force than it is a preparatory introduction to alternate modes of kinship. Here, DQSH is ‘family friendly’ in the sense of ‘family’ as an old-school queer code to identify and connect with other queers on the street.”
By using theatrics, bright colors, appealing stories, and a playful approach, drag pedagogy targets children, desensitizes them to a form of adult entertainment, and seeks to undermine protective elements like school and family.
Interestingly, Keenan and Kornstein never actually define pedagogy. While definitions vary, pedagogy, most simply put, is an approach to teaching knowledge or skills, usually to children. Drag Queen Story Hour doesn’t aim to teach, it aims to indoctrinate children into “queerness.” It isn’t pedagogy at all—it’s grooming.
On November 23, 2022, RADAR published TrevorSpace: A Pedophile's Paradise by Michael Costa in which we read,
We recently took some time to dig around the forum TrevorSpace, which they themselves describe as "an affirming, online community for LGBTQ young people between the ages of 13-24 years old." With over 400,000 members across the globe, they go on to say that "you can explore your identity, get advice, find support, and make friends in a moderated community intentionally designed for you."
Although sources say that TrevorSpace was investigated by law enforcement for facilitating inappropriate conversations among children and adults, the problem is still going on.
What we found will shock you.
TrevorSpace markets itself as a safe space for LGBTQ+ young people to talk about their experiences with identity and peer/familial rejection, which sounds like a great idea. But browsing the website for merely a few minutes makes it abundantly clear what it actually is: an online dating service for children and people aged 13-24. No website or chat room of this nature should cater to minors, especially one that encourages them to talk to adults. Adults in their 20s regularly talk to teenagers about sexuality and gender transition on Trevorspace. Profiles specify whether the user is over or under 18, but there is no procedure to verify whether the user is answering truthfully. Not only is the website specifically for children and adults, but someone of any age can say that they are a minor and have inappropriate conversations with kids.
Genspect, an organization which includes therapists, psychologists, researchers, and experts in this field, consistently point out that kids who are being transitioned often exhibit similar patterns of behavior and are victims of a social contagion. The website overwhelmingly consists of this exact demographic of kids. Although some of the theories about the teenage transgender epidemic have been heavily criticized, Trevorspace is basically the social contagion theory come to life. It is full of posts about how these girls are lonely, have little social support, low self-esteem, issues with body image, and have difficulty socializing with others. The two most alarming themes that we observed were that a lot of these kids are autistic and most of them express that they are same-sex attracted. It has been noted that a large percentage of children who are transitioning are autistic or same-sex attracted. They are being targeted. And the people doing the targeting are adults.
“Courage Is A Habit,” a parental rights group and friend of GAG, have pointed out that this new wave of child transsexualism can be attributed to a direct pipeline “from the classroom to the operating room.” They learn about various sexual identities as part of their school curriculum and even given surveys which directly ask them what their sexual identity is, pressuring them to pick an option. They are told that if they are confused or unsure about their identity, there are resources to help them, often listing The Trevor Project. Planned Parenthood, the largest distributor of hormones to kids, also recommends this website to kids who are at an age where people first start figuring this stuff out for themselves. The reality is that some kids mature faster than others. Therefore, some of the kids using this service who have not yet reached that point. Children are being pressured at school to pick an identity. It was not surprising that a large portion of their posts are about asexuality and asking for guidance about how to find their place on the “asexual spectrum.” Since they are being forced to choose a sexual identity label at school everyday, as young as kindergarten, when they are too young to even conceptualize such a concept, then they are going to choose labels on the “asexual spectrum” because kids are not sexual beings. This is not a controversial opinion – it is the difference between right and wrong.
The predatory website features various “clubs” that kids can join, where they are able to discuss their sexual identities with hundreds of other kids and adults. One of these clubs is called “Furries”, designed for people who are attracted to anthropomorphic animals. The discussions in this group often revolve around fetishism and how the “Furry Fandom” is not inherently sexual, but lets them know that there are a lot of people who engage in this for paraphilic reasons. Most of the conversations in the “Furries Club” are kids asking other users to help them discover their “fursona.” A fursona is a personalized animal character created by someone in the furry fandom. Fursonas may be anthropomorphic personas, idealized versions of their owners, fleshed out roleplay characters, or simply digital mascots. These posts feature cartoon drawings of their “fursonas” and describe different attributes that their character has. It is very easy to see how kids can easily get caught up in something that requires them to watch cartoons and pretend to be the characters they see on their screen. It seems harmless. These kids are probably just playing pretend, which is a normal thing for kids to do. But the people who are encouraging this behavior on Trevorspace are adults. According to a recent study on autoanthropomorphozoophilia, a paraphilic phenomenon where an individual is aroused by the idea of being an anthropomorphic animal and dresses up in animal costumes to live this fantasy, is a fetish in 99% of cases. It is linked to both autism and autogynephilia (fetishistic cross-dressing which develops in adulthood). It is very unlikely that these adults are all just playing pretend and do not have any fetishistic incentive. They also have clubs centered around BDSM and kink. An adult guiding a child and teaching them how to participate in their fetish is grooming and should never be tolerated in any circumstance. It is insulting that a website like this is marketed as a resource for “LGBTQIA+ young adults.” This has nothing to do with being same-sex attracted and is not beneficial to our community whatsoever. Gays Against Groomers would like to publicly denounce The Trevor Project for being an enemy to the people it claims to advocate for. It is outright betrayal and everything that the gay community spent decades fighting against.
These adults encourage social transition to these kids, leaving comments about how to dress and how to “pass” as the opposite sex. Social transition is a direct gateway to persistence of their trans identity and subsequent medicalization. They are applauded for taking puberty blockers, which are linked to osteoporosis, brain swelling, and future sexual dysfunction. They are given advice on how to get sterilizing hormones behind their parents’ back. And they are being taught that disembodiment/dissociating from their bodies is a good thing that everyone should try out.
A hot topic recently has been pornographic material in school libraries, which are labeled as “LGBTQ+ literature designed to help kids understand diversity and feel more included at school.” We are not sure what pornographic books have to do with being gay, but we completely reject this practice and the fact that it is being done in our name. One of these books is titled “This Book Is Gay” by a transwoman named Juno Dawson, describes how to use dating and hookup apps to children, including meeting up with strangers for sexual encounters. Trevorspace explicitly states that doing this is very unsafe and their website advises against it. After stating this, the next line says, “If you must meet somebody, please use this external guide (it is aimed towards adults, but a lot of it is also good information for teens). Hopefully it’ll help you make a healthy, informed decision!” Trevorspace tells children that they should not do something and then basically says, “But if you want to do it anyway, we have a guide to show you how!” There is never a circumstance in which this behavior is “healthy” for a teenager to engage in. It is a recipe for kidnapping and exploitation and needs to be terminated immediately. If The Trevor Project claims to advise against children meeting up with strangers, then why do they allow kids to make posts about their location and seeking a boyfriend/girlfriend in their area? Why are they encouraging kids to participate in this behind their parents backs and allowing adults to give advice about sex? The Trevor Project is a grooming organization that sexualizes children and puts them in danger. Trans activists can claim that there is no social contagion all they want, but the gay people in our coalition prefer to recognize it for what is is: a transgender grooming epidemic.
The kids who use this predatory dating service have threads and forums about how the website has “too many groomers and pedophiles,” yet the adults that they trust in their lives are telling them that it is a good source for social support. It is an identity crisis in a nutshell. The service is full of frantic posts from teenage girls freaking out over the fact that they are unsure of their sexual identity and how this is something that they need to figure out immediately. Since when is that considered appropriate? The most disturbing part is that a lot of these girls express that they are same-sex attracted. Instead of being told that there is nothing wrong with being gay and that they will figure this out eventually, The Trevor Project tells them that they are actually boys trapped in female bodies and minors need to be chemically castrated as soon as possible or there is a 40% chance that they will kill themselves. This overused statistic is a lie and The Trevor Project is facilitating the spread of this lie.
There are posts where girls say that they realized they were attracted to women and transitioned into boys in order to become straight. This is a new form of conversion therapy. Studies show that nearly 80% of these children will reach adulthood and realize that they are just gay, lesbian, or bisexual.
Trevorspace is a grooming nightmare come to life. It is a direct contribution to an impending health crisis in the gay community – an epidemic of detransitioned people whose lives have been ruined by this new form of teenage conversion therapy, which they were groomed into partaking in. Over the next decade, there is going to be a huge wave of detransitioners who realize that they were victims of conversion therapy and grooming. The wave has already started and is going to forever be a stain on our community that we look back on in horror. Given recent events in the UK and Mermaids, it is probably a smart idea to consider the possibility that a similar phenomenon is occurring across the pond.
Detransitioned people are usually shunned from the trans community and harassed by queer activists if they try to discuss their experience publicly. This is present in the Trevorspace forums. Kids who were permanently altered have made posts about feelings of regret. They are then chastised about how the detransitioner problem is a hoax and that recognizing their existence is considered hateful, invalidating, and harmful to the transgender community. If the transgender and queer community are so hung up on validation and accuse people of “denying their existence,” then why are they demanding that we deny the existence of gay people who were converted as kids and face medical/bodily harm for the rest of their lives? My community deserves better than that. Detrans people have a lot of important perspectives to contribute and they are welcome at our table any day.
Upon finding out that kids are using a website to connect with strangers and form polyamorous relationships with multiple anonymous individuals, people in our community are absolutely horrified. Most of us want nothing to do with these people and will not stop fighting it until it is shut down. The gay community is going to put an end to this and morally mandate it out of existence. And we expect everyone involved to be held accountable.
Gays Against Groomers believes that calling out The Trevor Project, schools, child transsexualism, and the budding detransition epidemic should come from within our community.
We all had the teenage experience of figuring ourselves out and becoming happy, confident, successful, and comfortable gay adults. Being given access to a website like Trevorspace would have made that process much more difficult, confusing, and dangerous. This is directly harming our community and is only going to get worse. We are going to talk about it until it is abolished.
In John Money: The Godfather of Gender Identity and Pedophile Apologist, Michael Costa wrote for RADAR (Jan 10, 2023),
Modern discussions of gender often include statements like, “Sex and gender are different.” or “Gender is something you identify as.” But where did these ideas originate? While many attribute it to feminists, the first person to use “gender” in such a way was John Money in 1955. He is often referred to as “the father of gender identity,” since he is the one who invented the term. While John Money is mostly famous for his work on transgenderism and the infamous David Reimer case, he actually has an extensive history of sexological research that is controversial, to say the least. Scarily enough, his ideas are currently being replicated in the current conversation about sex and gender.
John Money’s work on the sexual citizenship of children has earned him the title of “Pedophile Advocate” – rightfully so. His work on “chronophilia” described an erotic attraction to people of different age groups. These age groups included minors, not surprisingly. And he tried to normalize this for years, despite there not being scientific evidence that this exists whatsoever. In 1994, he opposed the classification of pedophilia as an abnormal fetish, even though that is what the overwhelming amount of research has proven (1994, p. 41). Clearly he had an ulterior motive and thought that it was appropriate to include his personal goals of “sexual liberation for children” in his work and label it as science. The same year, he said that he wanted to look at pedophilia “in the broader, cultural purview of sexuality’s timetables” and his reasoning was that pedophilia was historically legal and that society is stigmatizing “attraction to juveniles” in order to fulfill an anti-liberation agenda. His work includes advocating for a reconsideration of sex offender laws (1992) to further normalize child abuse in the law.
Just because something is considered legal in some places does not mean that it is good or should be accepted by society, but John Money begged to differ.
Not only did he seek the normalization of child abuse – he glorified it. In 1983, he claimed that these relationships should be considered a blend of “devotion, affection and limerence…a comradeship with a touch of hero-worship” and that society’s”rule of age-avoidancy” is negotiable (Money & Weinrich, 1983, pp. 42-43, 46, 53). He proposed the concept of “Lovemaps” and “sexuoerotic age” that include an age range of attraction which may differ from one’s actual age (Money & Clopper, 1974, p. 174). Once again, there was no solid scientific evidence that such a concept exists, but he decided to claim that it did, anyway. The fact that his ideas are reemerging in the current cultural climate and being labeled as “science” is worrisome, inaccurate, and should not be tolerated in any form. Frankly, we think they should be ashamed of themselves.
John Money’s work in the mid-1980s included a resurrection of “psychosexual age” (Money, 1986) a term from the 1950s that Money rebranded as “sexuoerotic age” (Hammer, 1954). That same year, he advocated for “erotic age roleplay,” suggesting that some people have an inner-child, making them attracted to minors and that this is something that should be accepted and encouraged…even though he did not have scientific proof to back him up. “Chronophilia” (Money, 1986), a palatable rebranding of his ideas about “age-discrepancy paraphilias” (Money, 1981) can be seen in modern-day concepts like “trans-age.” Queer Theory activists are claiming that people have an inner-child whose age does not match up with one’s “biological age.” It is a concept that they claim is similar to gender incongruence but is classified in terms of age – sometimes referred to as “age dysphoria.” Similar ideas can be seen in Money’s work. He claimed that “the paraphile’s age is discordant with his/her actual chronological age and is concordant with the age of their partner” (1986). He also applied these concepts to include “apotemnophilia” which is a term that describes people with an erotic fixation on amputees and castration fetishes in his work on skoptic syndrome. In 1985, Money claimed that “age matching” is normal and works the same way as a male being attracted to females. Money also advocated for “reciprocal sexuoerotic rehearsal play,” which is just a pseudo-intellectual way of saying “sexual activity for children” (Money, 1989). He was known for making up complicated jargon for pedophilic acts in order to purposely confuse his detractors into accepting his ideas as scientific advancement.
To quote an official “trans-age” Twitter page, “Transage is simply the identity we use to explain our experience because it is the most accurate way to describe persistently identifying as an age other than one's chrono age & typically feeling an intense desire to transition in full or part to living as one's identified age."
The vocabulary that these groomers use is strikingly similar to Money’s ideas about chronophilia and “Lovemap Age.” The similarities cannot be ignored. Groomer activists will claim that “This isn’t happening,” but we think they’re out of their minds.
John Money advocated for the sexual liberation of children, using pornography and kink.
He thought that “unrestricted enjoyment of erotica and sex in childhood” would encourage healthy sexual development in adulthood. In his book “Sexual Signatures: On Being a Man Or a Woman” (Money, 1976), he stated that pornographic images for children should be included in sex education. Specifically, he stated that "The best time to introduce such pictures is before a child's biological clock has signaled the start of puberty. Prepubertal children are intellectually capable of understanding sex, and their curiosity about life runs high." They will no doubt find these pictures erotically stimulating, but as the novelty wears off they will soon settle down and accept the information in the matter-of-fact way they accept information about other facets of adult life. If their first exposure to pictures of sexual relations between men and women comes after hormonal puberty has begun, the education will still be helpful but their erotic response will be harder for them to manage and they will need more exposure before the pictures cease to arouse it. In short, it takes older children longer to grow bored with such pictures." (Money & Tucker, 1976). He labeled his retractors as “victimologists” and said that people who oppose his ideas are just moralists who want to stifle the healthy development of children. He even criticized anti-pornograhy lesbian feminists, implying that they were just prudish and did not understand the importance of pornography and kink in psychosexual development. John Money thought that the desexualization of gender was in accord with the Zeitgeist of contemporary sexual politics together with victimology and an expanding criminalization of sex.
This is eerily similar to current-day trans activists who claim that pornographic content in schools is a good thing, and those who disagree are just overreacting and trying to harm the psychological development of “transgender children.”
Upon learning about the work of John Money, anyone with common sense can see that his ideas are being replicated in schools and child transgenderism. The resurgence of his ideas are concerning, to say the least. His made-up, anti-scientific concepts should be viewed with scorn and be abolished from our culture and public education system before it gets out of hand – it already has. The gay and lesbian members of our coalition believe that the work of John Money will forever be seen as a stain on the moral framework of society. We want his proposed sexual framework GONE. It’s disgusting. Get rid of it.
School Boy EXPOSES EXPLICIT Books In Schools, GROOMERS by Timcast IRL (March 5, 2023)
Ron DeSantis EXPOSES Book Ban Hoax, Books SO GRAPHIC Twitter CENSORS His Livestream by Tim Pool (March 8, 2023)
Why Are Schools Sexualizing our Kids? by Marci Strange for RADAR (March 23, 2023)
As a gay parent, I am concerned.
The latest example: “CA Healthy Kids Survey” asks students, “Are you straight, lesbian, gay, bi-sexual, or something else?” Another page asks if kids are different from the sex they were assigned at birth (transgender).
Why does any institution want to get into our kids’ “privates?” Who has access to this information, where will it be stored, for how long and why? Unless parents “opt-out,” it can confuse and make suggestions kids may never consider.
Teachers or staff promoting this lifestyle can lead to sexual exploitation, depression, drug addiction and attempted suicide. Puberty blocker referrals and removing reproductive organs as young as 12, without parental consent, must stop. Schools must not glorify LGBTQ+ lifestyles.
Attend school board meetings and vote out elected officials who promote any sexual preference.
In my experiences, trans kids can benefit from parental support, cognitive therapy and possibly mood stabilizers—not puberty blockers or irreversible surgeries because they may change their mind as adults or sooner.
“Gender affirmation” is an explosive, multi-billion dollar business cultivating life-long patients. Detransitioners are coming out by the thousands, deeply regretting transitioning at a young age, and are suffering a myriad of devastating side effects.
California, a sanctuary state performing gender affirming care without parent consent is wrong.
Lawsuits are piling up at taxpayers’ expense.
Parents, love your kids unconditionally and talk to them first. Boycott invasive surveys, transfer out of teacher-activist classrooms and pass on “Kid-Friendly Drag Shows.”
Academics, not politics in schools.
CREEPY Video Shows Woke Teacher INDOCTRINATING KIDS Into Thinking They Are NOT Boys Or Girls by Tim Pool (March 31, 2023)
Marjorie Taylor Greene SLAMS Democrat GROOMERS On 60 Minutes, Bill Maher SHOCKED At What Dems Do by Tim Pool (April 3, 2023)
Laser Pointers Up Their Butts "Drag Show" Is Coming To Your Library by Salty Cracker (April 3, 2023)
Children's Show SLAMMED For Showing Pride Parade Characters With Top Scars by Timcast IRL (April 13, 2023)
High School Students PROTEST DRAG SHOW, Say NO MORE To Far Let Indoctrination And FIGHT BACK by Tim Pool (April 13, 2023)
Florida Pride Parade CANCELED After DeSantis bans Children At Adult Performances, Democrats FURIOU.. by Tim Pool (April 27, 2023)
SHOCKING Poll Shows 40% of Democrats Want Children At Drag Shows by Timcast IRL (April 23, 2023)
ANDY NGO REPORTS: Drag queens perform sexually charged Mother’s Day show in front of children in Washington by the Post Millennial (May 14, 2023)
Drag queens perform sexually charged Mother’s Day show in front of children in Washington by Andy Ngo (May 14, 2023)
On August 6, RADAR published Spilling the Tea on the T; The Pedophilic Roots of the Trans Movement by Judith Rose. Here’s some of that…
Disclaimer: The point of this article is not to disparage all trans people, and we acknowledge the trans adults genuinely suffering from dysphoria attempting to live a normal life. We value our trans allies who align with us. Unfortunately, the deeper we dig into the ideology of transgenderism, the more we uncover uncomfortable truths that should not be ignored, but should be objectively scrutinized, taking into account their influence on the current day neo ideology.
The modern-day LGBTQ+ movement concerns much of the community for many reasons. We wanted equality, but once gay marriage was legalized it's as though the movement was weaponized to find a new goal to profit from. The movement has become unrecognizably more invasive and demanding than we ever wanted, even going as far as refining what it means to be gay and therefore redefining our community. We have been forced to question how the T made its way into the LGB in the first place. After just a few simple searches, we have discovered several figures responsible for planting pedophilic seeds of the trans movement that have grown into the twisted narcissistic monster we find ourselves fighting today.
For example, Robert Hogge aka Monica Helms designed the first trans flag in 1999 using the same infant referencing color scheme seen in symbols found on pro-pedophile websites: pastel pink, white and baby blue stripes. At first glance, most articles seem to describe Hogge as a noble veteran and first trans delegate from Georgia at the DNC (Democratic National Convention) with misunderstood interests and an internal struggle. He painted himself as something “ethereal” and “between worlds,” eventually being inspired by a friend to transition. Robert’s transition to Monica effectively ended his marriage and disrupted his family life.
Further on in this article, they write,
Don’t get us started on John Money, a major figure behind the push to normalize pedophilia and one we have already exposed. Money coined the term “gender identity” and opposed the classification of pedophilia as an abnormal fetish, stating: “If I were to see... a boy aged ten or eleven who’s intensely erotically attracted toward a man... if the relationship is mutual, I would not call it pathological." Money used a wide range of psychologically deceptive language to justify an attraction to children as well as sexual activity both with and among children. He is best known for the Reimer Twin experiment, a tragic tale that ended in suicide.
For whatever reason, many trans activists of today cite John Money’s work to justify the movement.
Next there’s Volkmar Sigusch, a German sexologist who popularized the term “cissexual” as an antonym to “transsexual” which evolved into “cisgender.” The term is now being used so negatively by “cis hating” activists that Elon Musk has declared it a slur on Twitter, now known as X. Sigusch once said "There is nothing wrong with pedophilia in the sense of the word, that is, against liking, even loving, children. The sensuality that unfolds between a child and an adult is something wonderful." He speculated that the attraction to children is not harmful, and pedophiles deserve therapy to work through their feelings. This rhetoric is borrowed by groups like NAMBLA (North American Man/Boy Love Association) and those who call themselves MAPS (Minor Attracted Persons) today.
Sigusch is not the only German sexologist who had a soft spot for pedophilia. He is often credited as a “main thinker behind the sexual revolution of the 1960’s,” and other German sexologists during this time also saw sexual relations with children as progressive and harmless. In fact, Germany’s Green Party advocated for the abolition of Paragraph 176 of the German Criminal Act, which criminalized sex with adolescents under 14. In the 1970’s, a psychology professor named Helmut Kentler collaborated with Berlin authorities to conduct an “experiment” by intentionally placing foster children with pedophiles. It was during this time (1973) that Volkmar Sigusch began serving at the Institute for Sexual Science at the Goethe University in Frankfurt, where he remained until 2006. Known as the Kentler Project, this so-called experiment went on until 1988, when Kentler declared it a success.
According to Dr. Sonja Levsen and her study on pedophile apologists, Sigusch is credited as one of the main advisory scientists for Dr. Frits Bernard’s paper titled: “Pedophilia–a Disease?” in which he concluded that the sexual abuse of children “did not damage their development.” Yikes. One of Sigusch’s first projects at Goethe University was with Gunter Schmitt. Together, they mislead teenage youth of West Germany with a deceptive study titled: “Teenage Boys & Girls In West Germany.” Participants were told the study was a general questionnaire regarding their homelife and habits, but Sigusch and Schmitt dove into intimate details about the teen's sexual habits, including masturbation and their earliest sexual memories.
We cannot neglect to mention the infamous Alfred Kinsey, a sexologist who served at Indiana University and so-called “father of the sexual revolution.” His reports on human sexuality, known as the Kinsey Reports, almost immediately made the New York Times’ Bestsellers list, but many are unaware of his controversial methods and conclusions of research. These reports not only hypothesized that infants can experience orgasms but suggested that pedophilic and incenstual relationships were actually beneficial to children. His research was disproportionately based on surveys taken from sex offenders, prostitutes and prison inmates. In 2010, a victim under the pseudonym Esther White came forward to tell a disturbing tale of how Kinsey paid her father to rape her in the name of science for Kinsey’s study. [source] Today, a bronze statue of Kinsey sits on a bench at Indiana University, and many are none the wiser.
Gender supremacists and radical trans activists of today have built a religious doctrine based on the work of these twisted minds and pedophile apologists. Their use of language is designed to force a new truth on the public, one that twists fantasy into fiction and demands a lack of questions, a glaring indication of cult thinking. Using figures like Sigusch to justify the separation of the terms ‘sex’ and ‘gender,’ these radicals are hard at work implanting the idea that gender transition cures all mental turmoil, while simultaneously claiming gender is a “social construct.” This doctrine has reached public schools, where impressionable innocents are easily led astray by advanced concepts designed to confuse and sexually activate them. But one cannot ask too many questions before incurring vehement reactions from radical trans activists. It is a deeply psychological and misleading movement that fails to address the many complications and concerns of advocating for child sex changes, and instead gaslights individuals who argue against it.
We cannot help but notice several of these activists have slipped up and admitted their attraction to children in some form or another. Indian trans activist Alok Vaid-Menon has attempted to convince the public that “little girls are also sexy.” While we can ignore Alok’s experimentation with self-expression, this quote is a big red flag that should not be taken lightly. TikTok personality Jeffrey Marsh has sparked controversy with problematic LGBTQ+ related content that encourages children to sever their relationship with their parents if they perceive any kind of discrimination at home, imagined or otherwise. Marsh refers to himself as a “they,” reinforces the idea of a gender binary while simultaneously denying it and encourages youth to subscribe to his Patreon for personal chats. His tactics are shared by child groomers like Jack Reynolds, a convicted pedophile who openly explained to the public that one of the first things a predator will do is establish or corrupt a child’s relationship with their family.
These radical activists who cite the work of pedophiles and pedophile sympathizers often advocate for “youth liberation,” or the idea that children can make their own decisions. This has never been an accepted idea in society for a laundry list of reasons, from a lack of experience to an underdeveloped prefrontal cortex. Using an ideology designed by perverts to push detailed sexual “education” designed to activate and radicalize, the neo trans movement is largely responsible for creating a hostile environment for all trans individuals, and not just those pushing the doctrine. Why? Because now children are the target. But if you know your history, this isn’t a surprise at all. It’s just something we must expose and fight against.
Sadly, it’s evident that government institutions are collaborating with this pedophilic agenda, much like Germany’s Green Party and Berlin’s authorities during the Kentler Project.
We want nothing to do with these perverts disguised as “LGBTQ heroes.” Many other so-called “trans rights activists” are carrying on the legacy of their pedophilic ancestors like John Money by insisting that children are sexual beings who should take puberty blockers to prevent their development, something that could stunt them into looking like children forever. Meanwhile, the United States is a hot spot for child trafficking, and according to a documentary titled: “Cut: Daughters of the West” by Canadian director Simon Esler, trans children have become a commodity among traffickers.
Coincidence? We don’t think so.
Sources:
Meet the Navy veteran who created the trans Pride flag - Atlanta Magazine
Creator of Trans Flag: Admitted Cross-dressing Fetishist (substack.com)
Pedophilic past – DW – 08/17/2013
The dark legacy of sexual liberation in Germany – DW – 06/17/2020
Berlin authorities placed children with pedophiles – DW – 06/15/2020
'Cis' Coined by “Pedosexual” Apologist
Alfred Kinsey: The Story Behind The Father Of The Sexual Revolution (allthatsinteresting.com)
Alfred Kinsey: 'Father of sexual revolution' who said rape benefits children (opindia.com)
Child Victim of Kinsey "Sex Research" Tells Story of Rape - Liberty Counsel (lc.org)
Author: Judith Rose
Radar Watchlist: Caitlin Spice by Judith Roae for RADAR (Aug 11, 2023)
The Queer Trans (QT) Project: Mailing Grooming Packages To Your Daughters by Michael Costa for RADAR (Aug 11, 2023)
Let us look at some of 11 Child Indoctrinating Books Parents Need to Know by Judith Rose for RADAR (Aug 14, 2023)…
1. Gender Queer (Graphic Novel)
Marketed to 18+, Gender Queer, along with a handful of others on this list, has been exposed in several schools around the country due to its graphic illustrations of a teenage girl with penis envy who experiments with binders and strap ons. The story depicts the character experiencing severe gender dysphoria, fear of her own body, and incestual conversations about masturbating. We’re sad that ‘Gender Queer’ distorts what it means to be a female and doesn’t teach readers how to love themselves as they are. This book does NOT belong in school libraries, but unfortunately that’s where it’s being found.
2. The Hips on the Drag Queen Go Swish Swish Swish
Marketed to literal infants (1+), this strange children’s book can be found being read by Drag Queens all over YouTube, including the author. Traditionally referred to as female impersonators, Drag Queens were once exclusively adult entertainers who made sexual jokes during provocative performances. We can’t for the life of us figure out why they suddenly want to read to exclusively children. We don’t see them at nursing homes or adult rec centers trying to entertain those who need it most, instead we see too many adults justifying why a man dressed as an exaggerated woman is the pinnacle of uniqueness that all children should admire. We’ve seen enough episodes of RuPaul’s Drag Race to know most Drag Queens aren’t exactly role models for anyone, much less children. Y’all are a mess. Why are you so desperate to appeal to minors?
3. This Book is Gay
Another title being found in school libraries, This Book is Gay is marketed to 14-17 year olds, and discusses gay sex in graphic details with illustrations included. Chapter 9 of the book is titled: “The Ins and Outs of Gay Sex.” But even more worrying than the pornographic explanations are the instructions on how to use sex apps. Despite the safety disclaimer which is obviously present to legally cover the authors butt, teenage readers are given explicit instructions on how to use apps to find strangers for sex. We shouldn’t have to explain why it’s dangerous for a 15-year-old to find this book and potentially end up in a vehicle with a full-grown adult who should know better.
4. In My Daddy’s Belly
Supposedly in its pre-order stage, this book claims to be “appropriate for kids of all ages” and supports the idea that men can give birth. We strongly disagree, and so has humanity for its entire existence up until very recent years. We submit that if an adult wishes to appear and exist as a man, then said adult would relinquish all female functions due to the intense dysphoria it would cause to use them. Confusing for both adults and kids alike, this book completely distorts what a female is and takes the magic out of the miracle of childbirth to claim that anyone can do it. Because women can’t have anything anymore. This is lesbian erasure. This is being straight with extra steps. Just...no.
5. The Every Body Book
Claiming to be aimed at children ages 8-12, ‘The Every Body Book’ capitalizes on the neo-ideology to warp young minds into believing that gender and sex are different, and you can be whatever you want to be despite your innate biology. Covering a wide range of topics, the book brags about using “gender-neutral language” and quotes specialists who think it’s a wonderful tool to teach kids about multiple personalities—oops, we mean identities, and incorporates racial diversities to ensure all kids know how to be nice to anyone who believes in the same pseudo-religious doctrine this book is pushing. Again, the concepts within this book are brand new to society, and there is absolutely no way the entire world will accept them because they contradict common sense and weaken already vulnerable people.
6. Flamer (Graphic Novel)
Aimed at 14-17 year olds, Flamer is another title being found in school libraries depicting gay sex and sexual abuse. In addition to explicit sexual situations depicting minors, Flamer also depicts self-harm, internalized homophobia, offensive religious commentary and has been added to many LGBT reading lists. We can appreciate the representation of the journey of being gay, but this book does not belong in schools for young children. After TPUSA reported finding this graphic novel in a Tempe, AZ Elementary School district, the book was removed from their database. [source] Why was it there in the first place?
7. Bye Bye Binary
Another children’s book supposedly for infants 1+, ‘Bye Bye Binary’ encourages parents to “break gender norms” by (gasp here) letting their child enjoy things. Newsflash: gay people have been breaking gender stereotypes for decades! Pink was once a color for boys in the Victorian era! Despite its intentions, this book solidifies dated gender norms from the 1950’s and reassures parents that it’s normal to ignore your child’s gender for years so they can choose it themselves by picking up a toy truck or a doll. The cover depicts a baby with an almost vengeful expression, as if it's aware of gender theory at the fresh age of 14 months. We doubt that.
8. Beyond Magenta
Aimed at 14-17 year olds, Beyond Magenta is a concerning book about “teenage transgenders,” telling tales of gender dysphoric minors who sometimes described themselves as “sexually mature children.” These minors often talk about hiding their behavior from parents, running away from home, and sexually experimenting as young as six years old. Some teens in the book describe themselves as “non-binary,” a new concept that enforces gender binary and stereotypes while enabling a sense of victimhood under a system that no longer exists. ‘Beyond Magenta’ was listed in 2015 as the fourth-most banned book in the United States due to its anti-family sentiments and described sex acts of minors. Some activists say the book normalizes pedophilia. We don’t think anyone under 18 should read this book, and we’ve seen it removed from several school libraries already.
Sadly there’s more. Read the rest here.
In The Wake of ‘Sound of Freedom’: The Parallels Between LGBTQ+ Activism and The Pedophile Doctrine by RADAR (Aug 16, 2023)
Let’s look at some of Radar Watchlist: Jeffrey Marsh by Judith Rose for RADAR (Aug 20, 2023)…
Jeffrey doesn’t have any kids, alludes to having a strained relationship with his own parents, and opens many videos with “I wanna talk to the kids,” or “Hi, kids!” He has also described himself as “Christlike,” despite practicing Buddhism. Grooming 101 involves establishing a relationship with the intended target and either separating the target from their families or establishing a relationship with their families as well. Marsh is big on what is referred to as “going no contact,” or cutting off family members if they “don’t understand you.” His use of language and speech pattern often resembles cult leaders who lure members in with wide eyes and a soft voice to demand control.
It’s important to know the signs of grooming with the intent of sexual abuse. Those who do may recognize several of the signs in Jeffrey’s content. But the average person who has never seen one of his videos, upon watching just a handful, would more than likely ask themselves “who is this creep and why does he want to talk to kids so much?”
But Jeffrey has deflected these accusations more than once, often turning on the commenter and accusing them of the same behavior, which is a classic narcissistic tactic of someone who does not want to acknowledge what they themselves are doing. Marsh’s fan base can be vicious, and a few of them even managed to track down one of his accusers, posting photos of her without her hijab and threatening her entire family. [source] Marsh seems to project a lot of his own issues for someone who claims to coach others through life, but since he’s not actually a licensed therapist, it seems he can get away with toeing a very careful line while encouraging young people to sign up for a more private line of communicating with him.
We cannot yet prove that Jeffrey Marsh is actively abusing minors, but we sure do recommend knowing who he is and making sure he isn’t influencing your children. Until then, we’re keeping a vigilant eye out for Mr. Marsh in the headlines.
And for good measure, here’s a creepy compilation of videos of himself deleted, but the internet never forgets.
Sources:
Daily Citizen:
Yes, Trans Activists Admit They Are Grooming Your Kids - Daily Citizen (focusonthefamily.com)
The American Conservative
Jeffrey Marsh Groomer 101 TikTok Tutorial - The American Conservative
BySurf
LGTBQ+ group criticizes CLT advisory appointment after member’s sex-offender past comes to light by Queen City News (Aug 21, 2023)
In the video one can see that they have a number of signs that demand that porn not be in school libraries and so on. Despite what @jeremotographs claims, this is not an anti-LGBT message.
Explicit books removed from K-12 school libraries but only after a public reading at school board by Washington Times (Aug 31, 2023)
BREAKING: Mayor of Burbank gets spanking from drag queen in front of children at campaign event by Libs of Tik Tok (Sep 10, 2023)
Confronted on Explicit Pornographic Books Offered to Kids, Colorado School District Blocks Libs of TikTok Domain by Gateway Pundit (Sep 21, 2023)
I have blacked out portions in the image below because they cartoon depictions of acts of pedophilia.
Kacsmaryk Cites ‘Gays Against Groomers’ In Decision Calling Drag Show Unfit For Children by Talking Points Memo (Sep 22, 2023)
Here’s the full text of the above post…
Colorado schools just can't help themselves. Grown adults desperately trying to keep talking to kids about their private sexual activities, what turns them on, begging them to identify as one or more genders, providing medical resources to get medications without parental knowledge, teacher's union instructing teachers to hide & destroy school records on the child, and more!
here is having an in-class lesson for MINORS to talk openly about what turns them on. At least you're consistent in constantly having adults engaging MINORS about sex while using the title of "teacher" as your protective shield. Never mind the growing numbers of kids failing in math, English, science, and real history throughout Colorado. You keep dedicating more & more time to focus on the sexual activities, behaviors, and thoughts of minors. HOME SCHOOL YOUR CHILDREN IN COLORADO UNTIL THESE PREDATORS & PERVERTS CAN BE DEALT WITH! #GaysAgainstGroomers
The following speech by Pat Condell is highly recommended . . .
California to fine schools that ban textbooks on race or LGBTQ+ topics by Axios (Sep 26, 2023)
California to fine schools that ban textbooks on race or LGBTQ+ topics by Axios (Sep 26, 2023)
Texas law banning some drag shows is unconstitutional, federal judge rules by CNN (Sep 27, 2023)
The Rise of All-Ages Sex Shops and How to Defeat Them by Radar (Sep 27, 2023)
The Rise of All-Ages Sex Shops and How to Defeat Them by RADAR (Sep 27, 2023)
In August of 2022 the Wink Wink Boutique, a self proclaimed Woman-Owned, Inclusive, Not Creepy, sex shop made national headlines. Why? Because this store goes out of its way to advertise to children. Yes, they proudly advertise as “age-inclusive." To add to the controversy, Jenn Mason, one of the owners is the School Board President for Bellingham School District. Not only that, but she and other sex “educators” teach sex ed classes IN their sex shop to children as young as nine years old.
In an interview with King 5 News, Jenn Mason was asked about the classes for nine-year-olds and had this to say: "Children have questions at that age. Some have even started going through puberty," said Mason. "I think we should be teaching sex education the way we teach anything else. We don't wait for kids to learn math the wrong way and then correct what they've learned wrong. We help them get it right from the start."
It is worth noting, as Jenn Mason would be aware, that the Bellingham School District, as well as nearly every other school district in the state of Washington, already provides sex education to nine-year-olds. So, why is she teaching at her sex store that she will not openly call to be taught in her schools? The answer to that question can be hinted at on the very first page of their website.
“WinkWink is sex-positive, body-positive, and gender-affirming. We welcome all people–including those of all genders, expressions, and sexual orientations–to our shop. We aim to help make sexual pleasure, wellness, and health available and accessible to everyone.
We believe that normalizing, accepting, and affirming all bodies, identities, and gender experiences is an inherently political act. Pleasure is our revolution.”
They make no attempt to hide their intentions. Their motivations are overtly political. The people who run this store believe that children should be taught about sex and pleasure the “right way," which is clearly based on their own values and beliefs around sex. So how does this affect children who might not be in the store with their parents' consent and approval?
To begin, it cannot be overstated that Jenn Mason sits in a position of profound power. She has the power to influence the school curriculum, guidelines, policies, and has direct access to teachers. It would be entirely possible, if not outright likely that Jenn Mason would instruct teachers and school administrators to direct students who wish to purchase sex toys, kink gear, books about sex and gender that they cannot get at school. Most egregiously, products like chest binders and various packers directly encourages “Trans-identifying” youth to pay the shop a visit. Of course, this would be done explicitly against parents' wishes, and would be hidden from parents without question. Without question, such behaviour would be an appalling abuse of power.
Now, in 2023 another WA sex shop has decided to advertise themselves as explicitly “All-Ages." Aphrodisia Boutique in Port Orchard is owned by a husband and wife, who identify as “queer, polyamorous, neurodivergent sex nerds." And that should tell you everything you need to know about their intentions.
Further on, they report,
They will be hearing from us very soon. We are holding a protest against this evil on September 30th.
There’s more to this article and it is recommended that the reader read it all here.
This is part of the Culture War Encyclopedia.
Thanks,
Justin Trouble
Laughter my Shield ∴ Knowledge my Steed
Wit I may Wield ∴ but Question my Rede
Liberty my Right ∴ Truth my Sword
Love my Life ∴ Honor my Reward
Keenan, Harper & Lil Miss Hot Mess (2020) Drag pedagogy: The playful practice of queer imagination in early childhood, Curriculum Inquiry, 50:5, 440-461, DOI: 10.1080/03626784.2020.1864621
See above.
See above.
As Christopher F. Rufo wrote in “The Real Story Behind Drag Queen Story Hour” for City Journal (Autumn 2022), “queerness” as the word is used in “queer culture” pertains to
academic discipline born in 1984 with the publication of Gayle S. Rubin’s essay “Thinking Sex: Notes for a Radical Theory of the Politics of Sexuality.” Beginning in the late 1970s, Rubin, a lesbian writer and activist, had immersed herself in the subcultures of leather, bondage, orgies, fisting, and sado-masochism in San Francisco, migrating through an ephemeral network of BDSM (bondage, domination, sadomasochism) clubs, literary societies, and New Age spiritualist gatherings. In “Thinking Sex,” Rubin sought to reconcile her experiences in the sexual underworld with the broader forces of American society. Following the work of the French theorist Michel Foucault, Rubin sought to expose the power dynamics that shaped and repressed human sexual experience.
“Modern Western societies appraise sex acts according to a hierarchical system of sexual value,” Rubin wrote. “Marital, reproductive heterosexuals are alone at the top erotic pyramid. Clamouring below are unmarried monogamous heterosexuals in couples, followed by most other heterosexuals. . . . Stable, long-term lesbian and gay male couples are verging on respectability, but bar dykes and promiscuous gay men are hovering just above the groups at the very bottom of the pyramid. The most despised sexual castes currently include transsexuals, transvestites, fetishists, sadomasochists, sex workers such as prostitutes and porn models, and the lowliest of all, those whose eroticism transgresses generational boundaries.”
Rubin’s project—and, by extension, that of queer theory—was to interrogate, deconstruct, and subvert this sexual hierarchy and usher in a world beyond limits, much like the one she had experienced in San Francisco. The key mechanism for achieving this turn was the thesis of social construction.
He writes furthermore,
By 1984, as Rubin acknowledged, stable homosexual couples had achieved a certain amount of respectability in society. But Rubin, the queer theorists, and the fetishists of the BDSM subculture wanted more. They believed that they were on the cusp of fundamentally transforming sexual norms.
Further on, he asks,
Where does this process end? At its logical conclusion: the abolition of restrictions on the behavior at the bottom end of the moral spectrum—pedophilia. Though she uses euphemisms such as “boylovers” and “men who love underaged youth,” Rubin makes her case clearly and emphatically. In long passages throughout “Thinking Sex,” Rubin denounces fears of child sex abuse as “erotic hysteria,” rails against anti–child pornography laws, and argues for legalizing and normalizing the behavior of “those whose eroticism transgresses generational boundaries.” These men are not deviants, but victims, in Rubin’s telling. “Like communists and homosexuals in the 1950s, boylovers are so stigmatized that it is difficult to find defenders for their civil liberties, let alone for their erotic orientation,” she explains.
Also,
Such positions are hardly idiosyncratic within the discipline of queer theory. The father figure of the ideology, Foucault, whom Rubin relies upon for her philosophical grounding, was a notorious sadomasochist who once joined scores of other prominent intellectuals to sign a petition to legalize adult–child sexual relationships in France. Like Rubin, Foucault haunted the underground sex scene in the Western capitals and reveled in transgressive sexuality. “It could be that the child, with his own sexuality, may have desired that adult, he may even have consented, he may even have made the first moves,” Foucault once told an interviewer on the question of sex between adults and minors. “And to assume that a child is incapable of explaining what happened and was incapable of giving his consent are two abuses that are intolerable, quite unacceptable.”
Rubin’s American compatriots made the same argument even more explicitly. Longtime Rubin collaborator Pat Califia, who would later become a transgender man, claimed that American society had turned pedophiles into “the new communists, the new niggers, the new witches.” For Califia, age-of-consent laws, religious sexual mores, and families who police the sexuality of their children represented a thousand-pound bulwark against sexual freedom. “You can’t liberate children and adolescents without disrupting the entire hierarchy of adult power and coercion and challenging the hegemony of antisex fundamentalist religious values,” she lamented. All of it—the family, the law, the religion, the culture—was a vector of oppression, and all of it had to go.
See above.
See above.
See above.
See above.
See above.
See above.
See above.
See above.
See above.
See above.
See above.
See above.
See above.
This is according to The Real Story Behind Drag Queen Story Hour by Christopher F. Rufo for City Journal (Autumn 2022)
This is according to The Real Story Behind Drag Queen Story Hour by Christopher F. Rufo for City Journal (Autumn 2022)
This is according to The Real Story Behind Drag Queen Story Hour by Christopher F. Rufo for City Journal (Autumn 2022)
Keenan, Harper & Lil Miss Hot Mess (2020) Drag pedagogy: The playful practice of queer imagination in early childhood, Curriculum Inquiry, 50:5, 440-461, DOI: 10.1080/03626784.2020.1864621
This is according to The Real Story Behind Drag Queen Story Hour by Christopher F. Rufo for City Journal (Autumn 2022)
Rufo, Christopher F. (Autumn 2022) The Real Story Behind Drag Queen Story Hour by Christopher F. Rufo for City Journal